Subject: Re: FROM_DAEMON Question

From: [email-masked] (Stephen R. van den Berg)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 1994 15:25:45 +0100

Nathan Edwards <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> From: [email-masked] (Bill Pfeiffer)
>> Well what I want is for [email-masked] to *pass* through,
>> and not be rejected by the FROM_DAEMON.

>:0
>* ^FROM_DAEMON
>* !^From [email-masked]
>/dev/null

That works, or, if you have a procmail that understands weighted conditions
(if you have a procmailsc man page):

:0
* -99^0 ^FROM_DAEMON
* 100^0 ^From [email-masked]
* whatever extra conditions
| action

-- 
Sincerely,                                  [email-masked]
           Stephen R. van den Berg (AKA BuGless).

In this signature, the concluding three words `were left out'.